Copy the claim exactly
Record regulator name, licence or certificate number, company, footer wording, linked seal destination and page date.
Live search snippets conflict: some describe a long-running Curacao licence while another warns about fake-licence spam. The only defensible answer joins the exact claim to a regulator record, company and authorised domain for the relevant date.
Open the verified play routeThis page is a decision worksheet built around a specific search task. It separates observable records, first-party wording and unresolved claims so the conclusion can be checked again after a material change.
Record regulator name, licence or certificate number, company, footer wording, linked seal destination and page date.
Search the issuer's own current and archived records where available. Check status and the domains explicitly covered.
The company in the terms, privacy notice, cashier and licence should reconcile. Document name changes rather than assuming they are harmless.
An offshore licence does not establish Australian permission. Check current ACMA information for the exact service independently.
Do not write simply licensed or unlicensed when the record is ambiguous. State which claim was tested, against which register, on what date and what remained unresolved.
No; Australian service legality is a separate ACMA question.
Only after its destination and regulator record are independently verified.
Publish the conflict with dates and avoid a present-tense conclusion.